Your girlfriend threatens a rape case because you refuse to marry her. Can a breakup really send you to jail? Indian law draws a crucial line between a failed relationship and deliberate deception.
NEW DELHI: A man enters a romantic relationship, discusses marriage with his girlfriend and develops a consensual physical relationship. However, because of personal differences, family opposition, or other circumstances, he later decides not to marry her. Instead of accepting the breakup, his girlfriend allegedly threatens to file a rape case on the grounds of a false promise of marriage.
Such situations raise serious legal concerns for men. Can a girlfriend file a rape FIR simply because her boyfriend refuses marriage? Can a consensual relationship later become a criminal case? Can the police arrest him under Section 69 BNS?
Under Indian law, refusing to marry a girlfriend or ending a consensual relationship does not automatically constitute rape or an offence under Section 69 BNS. However, if sexual intercourse was obtained through a marriage promise made without any genuine intention of fulfilling it, criminal liability may arise.
The Supreme Court of India has repeatedly distinguished between a genuine marriage promise that could not be fulfilled and a deliberately false promise made to obtain sexual consent. Understanding this distinction is crucial for men facing allegations of rape or a false promise of marriage after a breakup, particularly when an FIR, arrest or criminal prosecution is threatened.
CAN REFUSING TO MARRY YOUR GIRLFRIEND AMOUNT TO RAPE?
No. Refusal to marry, by itself, is not rape under Indian law.
Two adults may voluntarily enter a relationship, discuss marriage, become physically intimate and later separate.
A failed relationship does not automatically establish a criminal offence.
However, a woman may allege that sexual intercourse occurred without legally valid consent or that she was deliberately deceived into consenting.
The police and courts must examine the circumstances rather than treating every breakup as a crime.
The Supreme Court explained this distinction in Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra, (2019) 9 SCC 608. In examining consent based on a marriage promise under the IPC, the Court held that the promise must have been dishonest from the beginning and directly connected to the woman’s decision to engage in sexual intercourse.
Changing your mind about marriage is different from lying about marriage to obtain sexual relations.
WHAT IF YOUR GIRLFRIEND THREATENS A RAPE CASE AFTER A BREAKUP?
A statement such as “Marry me, or I will file a rape case against you” should be taken seriously.
But such a threat does not automatically prove that the girlfriend is making a false allegation. The underlying facts still matter.
A man cannot be forced into marriage simply because his former partner threatens criminal proceedings.
If the relationship was consensual and there was no dishonest inducement, evidence of that relationship and any coercive threats may be important in his defence.
Marriage must remain a voluntary decision, not the price demanded to avoid a police complaint.
SECTION 69 BNS: CAN A BROKEN MARRIAGE PROMISE LEAD TO 10 YEARS IN JAIL?
Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, effective from 1 July 2024, punishes sexual intercourse obtained through specified deceitful means or a promise to marry made without any intention of fulfilling it, where the act does not amount to rape.
The punishment may extend to 10 years’ imprisonment and a fine.
This is a separate offence from rape under Section 63 BNS.
The key question is not merely whether the man ultimately married the woman. It is whether the marriage promise was dishonest when it was made and whether the sexual intercourse was obtained through the alleged deception.
For example, a genuine intention to marry may later fail because of family opposition, incompatibility or changed circumstances.
Such failure does not automatically establish Section 69 BNS.
WHAT HAS THE SUPREME COURT SAID IN 2026?
In Kunal Rameshbhai Kalyani v. State of Gujarat, 2026 INSC 987, decided on 7 September 2026, the Supreme Court examined a Section 69 BNS FIR arising from a relationship in which the accused later refused marriage, citing his mother’s opposition.
The Court observed:
“We are unable to find the appellant having used any deceitful means.”
Finding that the complaint did not disclose the necessary deceitful inducement, the Supreme Court quashed the FIR.
The judgment reinforces that a genuine promise that is later not fulfilled must be distinguished from deliberate deception.
CAN YOUR GIRLFRIEND FILE AN FIR EVEN IF THE RELATIONSHIP WAS CONSENSUAL?
Yes. A woman can report an alleged offence, and the police may register an FIR where her allegations disclose a cognizable offence.
However, consensual intimacy and criminal deception are not the same thing.
A consensual relationship may be relevant to the defence, but consent to sexual intercourse does not automatically disprove a separate allegation of deception.
Likewise, photographs, hotel stays, or a long relationship cannot independently establish that every sexual act was consensual.
Courts examine the full evidence, including both parties’ conduct, the original intention behind any promise, and the circumstances surrounding the alleged acts.
Importantly, if no sexual intercourse occurred, the essential sexual-act requirement of Section 69 BNS is absent, although any other allegation must still be assessed on its own legal merits.
CAN POLICE ARREST A BOYFRIEND AFTER A FALSE PROMISE OF MARRIAGE FIR?
Section 69 BNS is a cognizable and non-bailable offence. This means an accused can face arrest and must take the allegation seriously.
However, registration of an FIR does not automatically make arrest compulsory.
An accused apprehending arrest in a non-bailable case may apply for anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS before the Sessions Court or High Court.
Where an FIR does not disclose the ingredients of an offence, the accused may also seek quashing under Section 528 BNSS. Such relief is discretionary and depends on the facts.
A man should obtain legal advice promptly rather than ignoring police notices or attempting to negotiate under pressure.
WHAT EVIDENCE CAN HELP DEFEND A FALSE RAPE OR SECTION 69 BNS CASE?
If your girlfriend threatens criminal proceedings after a breakup, preserving genuine evidence can be crucial.
- WhatsApp chats and messages: Preserve complete conversations showing the relationship, marriage discussions and any threats.
- Evidence of genuine marriage intentions: Family discussions, introductions, wedding preparations or other contemporaneous records may be relevant.
- Breakup conversations: Messages explaining why the relationship ended may help establish the circumstances.
- Call recordings and digital evidence: Preserve lawfully obtained material in its original form.
- Police complaints and legal documents: Keep copies of any representation, police notice, FIR or court order.
Electronic evidence must comply with the applicable Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, including Section 63 where relevant.
Do not delete or alter records, fabricate evidence, threaten the complainant or publish private conversations online.
CAN A MAN TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST A FALSE RAPE COMPLAINT?
Yes. If a woman knowingly files a false rape complaint to harass, threaten or harm a man, he may take legal action against her.
Under Section 248 BNS, deliberately making a false criminal accusation, knowing there is no lawful ground and intending to cause injury, is punishable with up to 5 years’ imprisonment or a fine of ₹2 lakh, or both. For false criminal proceedings involving serious offences punishable with at least 10 years’ imprisonment, the punishment may extend to 10 years and a fine.
A man can preserve WhatsApp chats, threatening messages, call recordings and other relevant evidence to establish that the allegations were knowingly fabricated.
However, acquittal or quashing of an FIR does not automatically establish that the complaint was false. Deliberate falsity must be proved, and the appropriate legal procedure must be followed. Where the accusation relates to court proceedings, Sections 215 and 379 BNSS may require action through the concerned court.
CONCLUSION
Refusing to marry your girlfriend is not a crime. A failed relationship or broken marriage promise does not automatically amount to rape or an offence under Section 69 BNS. The law distinguishes genuine relationships that end from deliberate deception used to obtain sexual intercourse.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasised that criminal liability must depend on the facts, evidence and intention behind the promise, not merely on a relationship ending.
If your girlfriend threatens a false rape case after a breakup, preserve your evidence, understand your legal rights and seek legal protection.
A woman has the right to refuse marriage. A man has the same right. Criminal law must protect genuine victims, not become a weapon to force someone into marriage.
FAQs
- Can my girlfriend file a rape case after a breakup?
Yes, but a breakup or refusal to marry alone is not rape. - Can a broken marriage promise lead to 10 years in jail?
Yes, under Section 69 BNS, if the required deliberate deception is proved. - Can WhatsApp chats prove a rape allegation is false?
They can help challenge allegations if they are relevant and authentic. - Can I get anticipatory bail in a Section 69 BNS case?
Yes, under Section 482 BNSS, depending on the facts. - Can I take legal action against my girlfriend for a false FIR?
Yes, potentially under Section 248 BNS, if a knowingly false charge is established.
Contact Us
Send a general enquiry to the 69BNS team. Please avoid sharing confidential case details.
One Response